Continuity of care: the organising goal
Continuity of care is what the concept system exists to protect: the ability of a subject of care to move between services, organisations, and sectors without losing the thread of their care.
Whether the starting point is an injury, an illness, or a social issue, good outcomes depend on care processes that connect — within a team, across departments, and between organisations. Achieving that requires more than goodwill: it requires the processes, their sequencing, and their hand-overs to be describable in terms every party understands the same way. That is precisely what the conformant model provides.
The model captures the machinery of continuity explicitly:
- The thread of care over time. Care contacts, encounters, care appointments, and episodes of care let a fragmented sequence of interactions be understood — and reported — as one continuing story, including the delays that interrupt it.
- The two coupled cycles of care. A care process runs as two connected cycles, each iterating through assessment, care planning, an intervention, and evaluation — where care evaluation is always of the care activities performed, asking whether they achieved what was planned. In the first cycle the intervention is care investigation, and each pass, concluded by a health condition assessment, deepens the understanding of the person's health state and its identified health conditions. That understood health state is handed over to the second cycle, where it is the input to a care needs assessment; here the intervention is care treatment, acting to change the health state. And the process is anything but linear: the changed health state returns for a renewed health condition assessment, so the cycles repeat — coincident or in parallel, since clinicians routinely investigate and treat at once — carrying the process from an input health state to an output health state. Modelling both cycles, the handover, and the return path makes gaps and loops visible rather than anecdotal.
- Requests and referrals. Initial requests for care, referrals, and requests for service — each with its reason for request for care — are first-class concepts, so the joins between providers are documented with the same rigour as the care itself.
- Responsibility and mandates. Care mandates, care commitments, informed consent, and proxy mandates record who is authorised and accountable at every step, which is what makes hand-overs safe rather than hopeful.
The standard's own master drawing of these activities appears full-size in The master diagrams.
Because these concepts are shared across clinical and social care, continuity does not stop at the sector boundary — the same episode can span a hospital ward, a community team, and a social care provider without changing vocabulary. See Social care as a first-class citizen.