Use case: referral and service directory signposting
A GP encounter surfaces a social need. The conformant model carries that need — with its reason — through a care service directory to the right community provider.
Signposting fails when the need identified in one place cannot be expressed in the terms the directory, or the receiving service, understands. The model closes that gap by giving the need, the request, the directory entry, and the referral a common semantic backbone.
Concepts at work
- The consultation is a care contact — an encounter in which a health condition assessment identifies not a clinical issue but a social need.
- A request for care is raised, carrying its reason for request for care so the receiving end knows why, not just what.
- A care service directory lists care service offerings in the same concept system, so matching need to offering is a semantic operation rather than a free-text guess.
- A referral initiates a new episode of care with the matched community provider.
- A continuity facilitator mandate can span the whole journey, keeping one accountable point of oversight however many providers become involved.
The same pattern scales from a single practice signposting to local voluntary services all the way to national directory infrastructure — the concepts do not change with the size of the directory.